History. Midst of the week. Berdyaev, Nikolai

   
The woman clothed with the sun
  Home  
Свящ. Писание     ru     en  
       
 
 
. Download
zip-file
Main
+ Categories
+ Apparitions
La Salette
Fatima
Beauraing
Heede
Garabandal
Zeitun
Akita
Melleray
Medjugorje
History
Apostasy
Communism
1000 years
Bible
Theotokos
Commentary
Prayer
Rosary
Theosis
Heart
Sacrifice
Church
Society
Nature
Personalities
Texts
Articles
Directory
References
Bibliography
email
 
Fatima. Historical dates Category: History Garabandal. Historical dates

History
Midst of the week
According to Nikolai Berdyaev

The length of our days is seventy years

Week, seven, seventy — all these point to the complete cycle in time.

10 The days of our years [are] threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength [they be] fourscore years, yet [is] their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away.

9 The writing of Hezekiah king of Judah, when he had been sick, and was recovered of his sickness:
10 I said in the cutting off of my days, I shall go to the gates of the grave: I am deprived of the residue of my years.

Падение в период величайшего внешнего блеска

Великое падение античного мира совершилось тогда, когда образовалась самая утонченная эллинистическая культура. Падение это определилось какой-то внутренней болезнью в корне поразившей эту культуру и сделавшей неизбежным ее падение именно в период величайшего ее внешнего блеска.

Это падение совершилось тогда, когда было достигнуто состояние вселенскости.

The other very strange and tragic result was that the ancient world, although it had become unified, was about to collapse. Its fall and that of paganism were imminent. The great Hellenic culture and the great state of Rome were both destined to suffer an eclipse. But this occurred only when the foundations of a universal state had been laid. Thus, while the high flowering of the ancient world dates back tb the time of comparatively small states without any claim to universal significance, might or glory, its disintegration coincides with the attainment of both the universal idea and state, and also with the spiritual refinements of later Hellenistic culture.

This, I believe, is one of the capital facts of world histtiry, and one which more than any other compels us to ponder on the nature of the historical process and reconsider many of the theories of historical progress. The decline of the ancient world was no accident. It had been determined not only by the barbarian invasions which destroyed the treasures of the ancient world, but also by an inner disease, whose symptoms historians admit more and more readily, and which attacked its very roots and made its fall inevitable precisely in the period of its greatest superficial brilliance.

The fall of Rome and the ancient world teaches us two directly opposite things. It demonstrates the instability and fragihty of all terrestrial things and cultural achievements; and it constantly reminds us that all cultural achievements are corruptible and contain the seed of their own decay when opposed to eternity. But in the Hght of history, this fall teaches us not only that culture has its stages of birth, flowering and decay, but diat it is also based upon an eternal principle. For, while the ancient world was succeeded by a period of barbarism and darkness in the seventh, eighth and ninth centuries, it is also true to say that culture has surviyed the ages.

Период просвещения оборвался

Просвещение должно было бы торжествовать по прямой линии развития, но в истории это не так.

The culture of Babylon, for example, was so perfect that in many respects it was in no wise inferior to that of the twentieth century. It is very essential for the philosophy of history to establish this point. Thus ancient Greece lived through a period of enlightenment which coincided with the development of Sophist criticism and is directly analogous to that of our eighteenth caitury. This enlightenment was supposed to triumph along a direct line of development. But history proves that die period of Greek enlightenment came to an abrupt end and was superseded by a great idealistic and mystical reaction, whose exponents were Socrates and Plato. This spiritual reaction against scepticism and rationalism was to run through the whole of the Middle Ages and thus stretches over a period of more than a thousand years. This fact is, however, absolutely incomprehensible from the standpoint of progressive enlightenment. How are we to account for such a lasting reaction? Many modem historians of Greece, such as Beloc, for example, are hostile to this spiritual current, and see in Plato the initiator of a reaction wHch lasted until the time of the Renaissance. But why then did the ‘enlightenment’ not continue? This brings us to a very interesting problem of the philosophy of history.

See also

Links

Bibliography

       
     
        For this research to continue
please support us.
       
       
       
Contact information     © 2012—2018    1260.org     Disclaimer